Developer builds near-exact Hacker News clone with AI comment plan
- Doom: Planned AI-generated comment feature was not built; site mirrors real HN instead
- Boom: Developer released source code for a near-exact Hacker News clone on GitHub
- Neutral: HN moderator dang collaborated and named the codebase "sharc"
- Doom: Project took four months; developer says they will likely not finish it
The story in full
A developer published a mostly-exact clone of Hacker News at news.ycombinator.lol, with source code released at github.com/shawwn/sharc. The project took approximately four months to develop, and Hacker News moderator dang collaborated on it and suggested the codebase name "sharc".
The original goal was to populate the clone with AI-generated comments instead of real ones, but that feature was not completed. Currently the site mirrors real Hacker News comments, which the developer acknowledges makes it "completely pointless." The developer states they are unlikely to finish the AI comment feature.
Analysis
335 wordsIn early October 2026, a developer published a near-exact clone of Hacker News at news.ycombinator.lol and released the source code on GitHub under the repository shawwn/sharc. The project took roughly four months to build. Hacker News moderator dang contributed to the effort and suggested the codebase name sharc. The site currently mirrors real Hacker News comments rather than generating its own, which the developer openly describes as making it completely pointless.
The original concept was more provocative than the finished product suggests: the developer intended to replace every comment on the clone with AI-generated ones, effectively simulating a parallel Hacker News where the community voice is synthetic. That ambition is what gives the project its significance beyond a technical exercise. A fully realized version would have raised pointed questions about whether AI can reproduce the texture of a specific online community well enough to be convincing, and what it means for trust in discussion platforms if such clones become easy to operate. The developer has now said they are unlikely to complete that feature, leaving the more interesting experiment unrun.
None of the three camps have published reactions to this story yet. Pro-AI voices would typically highlight the technical achievement of replicating a complex platform and frame the AI comment concept as a legitimate research or creative project worth exploring further. Anti-AI voices would likely treat the original plan as a cautionary example of how AI could be used to manufacture fake community consensus at scale, and might argue that even an incomplete project normalizes the idea. Middle-ground observers would probably focus on the transparency the developer showed, noting that publishing the source code and admitting the limitation openly is precisely the kind of disclosure that separates acceptable experimentation from deceptive deployment.
The detail worth watching is whether the developer or anyone who forks the sharc repository eventually builds out the AI comment layer. If that feature ships in any form, the conversation about synthetic online communities would shift from hypothetical to concrete very quickly.
Where do you stand?
Add your take
0 reader votesSign in with Google to pick a side and post. Your vote moves the story's Doom / Boom score.
Sources
1 article from 1 outlet- Hacker News front page (AI)Show HN: Pointless but mostly-exact clone of Hacker News

